Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Early NFL Superbowl Odds AFC -10 Trashed with Colt’s Loss

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

The Steelers are Broncos are very legitimate AFC teams but public perception goes a long way in inducing NFL Superbowl Odds. In fact, Las Vegas is going to shade the line on the the public team in the Superbowl. I would even go so far as to say that if the Steelers made it to the Superbowl, that they could even be underdogs to the Seattle Seahawks.

My advice to anybody in the future years is when they see an early betting line like this AFC -10, to go against the public perception. The best bet in the early line would be to take the NFC at +10 because the line was completely formulated based on the assumption the Indianapolis Colts were making it to the Superbowl. There is value if they do not. With a Broncos and Steelers matchup possibly being a 3-7 point spread, you can take the AFC team and hope for a middling situation. A middling situation is when you both on both sides of a game and win both of them.

Watch The Super Bowl Online

NFL Betting System For shiny Football Betting

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

It’s very easy to learn and consume so there’s no excuse for not giving it a try – beneficial luck!

First, consume a peruse at the NFL schedule for the week and identify the underdogs playing at home.

For the underdog team playing at home, choose sign of the team they are playing against.

What you want to do now is compare the stadium surface of the team playing at home against the stadium surface that the away team is mature to playing on. I shall list all the NFL teams play surfaces below.

If the underdog team playing at home is playing on a different type of surface than the away teams home stadium, then bet for the home underdog team in the line spread to earn.

Basically this NFL betting system is to bet on the underdog team playing at home versus a team that is not worn to playing on that stadiums surface type. Always bet on the point spread, not the money line.

For example, if the Cleveland Browns are playing at home versus the recent England Patriots and the Browns are the underdogs, then you will state a straight wager bet on the Cleveland Browns in this game as the Browns stadium has a grass surface, while the Patriots home stadium has a turf surface.

The Patriots are more conventional to the turf surface that they play on at home, therefore their chances of winning notably lessens when they are playing on a stadium that has a grass surface.

Here are the NFL surface conditions to befriend you with this 63 percent winning system:

NFL Teams and Home Surface Conditions

Arizona Cardinals Grass
Atlanta Falcons Turf
Baltimore Ravens Turf
Buffalo Bills Turf
Carolina Panthers Grass
Chicago Bears Grass
Cincinnati Bengals Turf
Cleveland Browns Grass
Dallas Cowboys Turf
Denver Broncos Grass
Detroit Lions Turf
Green Bay Packers Grass
Houston Texans Grass
Indianapolis Colts Turf
Jacksonville Jaguars Grass
Kansas City Chiefs Grass
Minnesota Vikings Turf
New England Patriots Turf
New Orleans Saints Turf
NY Giants Turf
NY Jets Turf
Oakland Raiders Grass
Philadelphia Eagles Grass
Pittsburgh Steelers Grass
St. Louis Rams Turf
San Diego Chargers Grass

There you have it. A simple NFL Betting System for you to utilize and profit from.

Now, here are some additional NFL Betting System Tips to relieve this system.

If you are novel to American Sports Betting there are a couple of terms worth learning. Firstly, to bet on the money line means to bet on a team to salvage outright. If the team wins, you procure, if it loses, you lose.

The money line has different unique values depending on the teams fervent so betting on the underdog team (like in the betting system above) you’ll acquire more and less when betting on the favourite.

The other type of bet is betting on the “Point Spread”. This is a accomplish of handicapping in which odds makers predict the level of points stronger one team can be expected to be over another.

So, if your bet is on a team which has a +3 in the point spread it means that even if this team loses the game by 2 points, your bet will aloof prevail. Again, if the team you are betting on has a – 4 point spread, then for your bet to regain your team has to beat the other team by more than 4 points.

The point spread changes during the days hasten up to the game. As you’ll be betting on the underdog with this NFL betting strategy its best to behold for better value early on as opposed to wait. nfl betting

Watch The Super Bowl Online

Football Agility Drills

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

You’ve probably seen football players running through tires. You also may have seen football players running over blocks and around other obstacles. These are all football agility drills that attend a player improve his balance and agility.

But there are many other drills that football players can do in practice as well. These drills are effective whether they are being musty for youth football agility drills or professional football agility drills.

piece of being agile is being able to commence and terminate posthaste. Since football is played in spurts of only a few seconds at a time, being able to explode into motion is very significant.

Players can be helped with starting and stopping simply by running short sprints in practice everyday. Not only will this assist them with their agility but it will also befriend them with their physical conditioning.

A more specific running drill that also helps with conditioning and agility are shuttle runs. Shuttle runs require a player to speed a definite distance, turn and hasten support, and then urge another longer distance. The distance keeps getting longer and each time the player must hurry succor to the site where he began.

For example, the player has to bustle 10 yards, go succor, speed 20 yards, and then go assist, then 30 yards, etc. Not only does this serve improve a player’s stamina and endurance but it also helps the player learn to take-off and explode into action.

Another one of the gargantuan football agility drill involves working one-on-one with a player. So it can’t be done with the team as a whole during practice. For this drill all you need is a step and a weighted ball. You may want to spend a football instead of a weighted ball, that’s agreeable too.

First, have the player step-up onto the step and balance himself on impartial one leg. Then have him slowly return succor to the ground. He should do 2 sets of 20 step-ups for each leg. His movements should be unimaginative and deliberate and his body should be under control at all times.

Once the player has mastered stepping-up, start throwing him a weighted ball while he is standing on the step (with one leg) . The player should salvage the ball and then throw it benefit without losing his balance. This should be done in 2 sets of 20. Remember, you can also spend a football for this drill instead of a weighted ball.

Having solid agility is a must for football players. That’s why it’s famous for football players to accomplish football agility drills in practice. These drills should wait on the players improve their ability to burst into action, retain their balance, and change directions. All of these abilities are needed on the football field for objective about every play.

Watch The Super Bowl Online

The Exorcism of Emily Rose Movie Download

Saturday, November 7th, 2009

The Exorcism of Emily Rose Movie Download

The Exorcism of Emily Rose Movie Download

Download & Watch The Exorcism of Emily Rose at Amazon.com.

Click Here Now to Download & Watch The Exorcism of Emily Rose Online Now!

We’re all dogged by our own little demons that cast doubt, shake our faith in ourselves and pull apart our world. However unlike the character of Emily Rose in this thought provoking drama none of our demons are named Lucifer. “The Exorcism of Emily Rose” tackles the issue of faith, how science has displaced our belief system rationalizing everything around us and pulled us out of the psychological barbaric dark ages. The film dares to ask, what if our rational side is wrong? What if there are supernatural forces beyond our comprehension which drive the world around us every day? A compelling tale that mixes fact (the film is based on the true story of Anneliese Michel documented by Dr. Felicitas Goodman in the book “The Exorcism of Anneliese Michel”) with the format of a suspense thriller, court room drama and delves into the place of faith and reason in our society. I’ve seen many people disappointed by the fact that this isn’t “The Exorcist”. This is a suspense drama NOT a horror film like “The Exorcist”. The exorcism itself isn’t the focus of this movie but, instead, a sidebar. This is really about the after effects of what happens to Father Moore and Erin.

Laura Linney plays defense attorney Erin Bruner an agnostic gun for hire that recently won a highly publicized murder trial. When the head of her firm (Colm Feore) asks her to take on a case for the Catholic Church involving a priest Father Moore (Tom Wilinson) accused of negligent homicide of Emily Rose (Jennifer Carpenter) she finds her disbelief melting as she’s drawn further and further into the case. It seems that Emily, her family and Father Moore believe that she was possessed by the Devil. The prosecutor Ethan Thomas (Campbell Scott) is a man of strong religious beliefs who finds himself convinced that the girl was an undiagnosed epileptic who died because she was denied nutrition, medical help and the medication to control her seizures. This collision of church and state creates more than sparks as Erin discovers disturbing evidence that Father Moore may be right. She’s further disturbed when strange things begin to occur to her just as they did to Emily and to Father Moore after the death of Emily. A warning though to fans expecting gore galore–this isn’t your typical horror film like “The Devil’s Rejects” or “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre”. Instead, it’s more of a suspense thriller using elements of the horror genre.

A thought provoking film filled with intelligent performances, some genuinely scary sequences and many unanswered questions, “The Exorcism of Emily Rose” may come across as a bit too pat at its conclusion but the ride itself makes the film worth it. This unrated version runs about 3 minutes longer than the theatrical version.

“Exorcism” doesn’t have the heavenly glow of the many brightly colored epics and comic book films we’ve seen this year and that works to the film’s advantage. Filled with moody cinematography, striking images and plenty of mystic fog the transfer looks very good. There are some minor issues with compression particularly during one sequence involving heavy fog but, on the whole, the film captures the stark and scary look of its theatrical debut. The 5.1 Dolby Digital Surround soundtrack becomes genuinely spooky during many of the scenes involving Emily and Father Moore but the more tense court room scenes come across as much more passive involving only the ambience of the court. That stark contrast between these two worlds and experiences make the scenes involving Emily’s “breakdown” and exorcism all the more riveting.

We get a featurette that examines the history of the film and how the real event inspired the filmmakers to tackle such a daunting project with such an unusually intelligent approach. There’s also a featurette that focuses on the visual approach for the film this is interesting as the director is, essentially, telling two different stories from two different points of view. As I mentioned before very few films have balanced the thriller aspects with those looking at the role of faith in our society and “Exorcism”, like “The Exorcist”, manages to transcend the limitations of the genre. We also get a single deleted scene that, although important from a character development point of view, clearly would have slowed the narrative down and was wisely extracted.

The commentary by director/co-writer Scott Derrickson focuses on many aspects of the production from the elements they borrowed from the real case to those of performance and integrating visual effects into the film in a believable fashion. The latter was missing from both “Dominion” and “The Exorcist: The Beginning” and, hence, undermined both those films from becoming little more than a footnote in the suspense/thriller/horror genre. In many respects, Derrickson’s film acts almost as a “sequel” to “The Exorcist” (as that film was also based on a real life exorcism they share an incident that occurred as the basis of their projects). Derrickson’s comments are intelligent and thoughtful about the project and the challenges he and his cast faced in making the story both compelling and believable.

The unrated version (which is the version I saw)doesn’t appear to me to feature any more gore than the theatrical version. My guess is that it features scenes that run just a tad bit longer but weren’t included in the theatrical version. While the film sputters a bit by the time of the conclusion, the two hour journey was still more than worthwhile. A warning though to fans expecting gore galore–this isn’t your typical horror film like “The Devil’s Rejects” or “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre”. The film manages to combine elements of “The Exorcist” and shows like “Law & Order” into a compelling mix all its own. Drawn into the darkness that consumes Emily both Father Moore and Erin are changed forever by their experience.

In a little under a month (as of this writing) one of the year’s best movies, “The Exorcism Of Emily Rose”, will be coming out on DVD. It’s coming in two formats – the theatrical edition and the unrated edition, which presents something of a dilemna. Normally I Always go for the full uncut version of a movie, even if it means waiting a long time, but now in the case of two movies I’ve seen at the theater this year (this and “Dark Water”) there are unrated editions coming out of what was perfect the first time around. My curiosity and my instincts are to go with the extended editions (”Underworld”, “Dawn Of The Dead” etc. would Not have been as good with Any of the material in the Unrated Extended Editions absent), but there’s a vague fear of ‘why tamper with perfection’ in this case? I don’t know, maybe I would have felt the same if I’d first seen “Underworld” or “Dawn” in the edited theatrical versions, although I can’t think of anything that could have been cut from either of those movies that wouldn’t have diminished their greatness. Anyway, the theatrical version is what I’ve seen, so that’s the edition I’m reviewing.

First of all, if you have any qualms about not seeing this movie because of it true life connections (as opposed to “The Texas Chainsaw Massacre”, which despite the hype was only Very loosely based on real events, the basis of the story having already been formulated – according to Tobe Hooper – before he ever heard of the Gein case) I’d urge you to see the movie anyway. I admit to having had some uneasiness myself, unlike with a series such as “Amityville” which was launched with the support of the people actually involved in the real (I suppose I should say supposedly real, although I find the story credible) events. “The Exorcism Of Emily Rose” was based on undeniably real events – whether or not you believe in the possession angle – involving real tragedy, so I did have my doubts.

Suffice it to say that the first half hour of the movie annihilated those doubts completely, and not just because of the super quality of the movie. I can’t be specific without risking spoilers, but I’ll say that “The Exorcism Of Emily Rose” proved to me that not only was it based on events where it was acceptable to make a movie out of it, but advisable.

Juxtasposing the horror movie, the courtroom drama, and the ‘theological/philosophical/ethical issues’ movie as if it were the most natural thing on Earth, “The Exorcism Of Emily Rose” tells the tale of an exorcism gone wrong (not a spoiler; that’s apparant from the first five minutes) and the ensuing criminal case charging the priest who presided over the exorcism with negligent homicide. Told, in about equal ratios, in two timeframes – one leading from the aftermath of Emily’s death through to the court case and beyond, the other from before Emily’s initial possession through to her eventual death – the movie perfectly brings to life a cast of characters that it’s impossible not to care deeply about (helped in no small part by the universally brilliant performances). The battles in and out of the courtroom are heated, but ironically there are no human ‘bad guys’ in the movie. The prosecuting attorney believes in his position, actually more strongly than the defending attorney does in hers, at least initially. The ‘bad guy’ element is provided by what happened to the Emily Rose character. In pursuing the route of an actual possession, few movies have ever come close to being so terrifying in their depiction of true, literal Evil. And yet at the same time there is an abundance of brightness and inspiration in the tale. Unbelievable suspense and some unforgettably horrifying moments mixed so fluently with the other side of the coin is in itself a great achievement, and “Exorcism” hits all the other marks with equal force: outstanding production, incredible visuals, tremendous musical score, superb character interaction, the whole range of everything you could ask for.

Truly one of the greatest movies of all time, definately one of 2005’s very best.

This movie was more then a horror-suspense movie. Although some may say differently, this movie WAS based on true facts of a 19 year old girl, whose name was Anneliese Michel, and it happened in the late 1970’s. This movie just grabs you by the neck and sucks you in. After you’ve started watching it, hold on for dear life, you’re in for one “hell” of a ride.

It’s been a long time since I walked out of a movie crying and shaking for 30 minutes. I can’t wait for it to come out so I can just keep watching it. It’s like not wanting to stare at someone getting in trouble, but just not being able to tear your eyes away from it. I’m not sure it’s the best movie for a someone under 15 or so, but for those adults out there who KNOW there’s something out there that has more power over us, it’s a must-see.

I reccomend this to ANYONE who wants to see a movie that is not only scary on many levels, but a movie that gets right into your head and shakes things up like they’ve never been shaken before.

It’s incredible….many bows to the director and actors of this “documentary” unlike any other.

The Informers Download

Friday, November 6th, 2009

The Informers Download

The Informers Download

Download & Watch The Informers at Amazon.com.

Click Here Now to Download & Watch The Informers Online Now!

Intrigued by the premise of the decadent 80s in LA [and all the star names associated with this movie], I decided to rent it. The result however was completely underwhelming, and left me feeling disappointed and annoyed at wasting my time on it. The movie plays out ala “Crash” in the sense that you have all these characters that are kind of linked with each other through certain circumstances. There’s a Hollywood honcho [Billy Bob] who has a tumultuous and strained relationship with his wife [Kim Basinger] because of his dalliances with a newscaster [Winona Ryder]. His son [Jon Foster] is heavily involved in a world of sex and drugs, a world which includes his promiscuous girlfriend [Amber Heard]. There’s a father-son pair who can’t seem to connect with each other [Chris Isaak and Lou Taylor Pucci], a disillusioned rock star [Mel Raido], and a doorman [Brad Renfro, whose appearance in this movie was his last prior to his death] who is forced to put up with his con artist/criminal uncle [Mickey Rourke] and his nefarious activities [which include the kidnapping of minors].

The story arcs seem compelling, but they are never explored with any great level of depth, and the connection between these various arcs are at best, tenuous. I just felt underwhelmed by most of the performances – Billy Bob just seems to have this vacant expression on his face for most of the movie, Amber Heard’s performance highlight was exposing her delectable bits and pieces, Brad Renfro blubbers throughout, and the list goes on. The exception was Kim Basinger who is actually quite compelling and credible in the role of the betrayed wife.

“The Informers” tries its best to engage viewers’ attention and elicit sympathy, but I felt emotionally disconnected from the major players, and felt the movie was shallow and under-developed in its’ theme and characters portrayals. A rental at best.

a good adaptation of an excellent novel. what may come across as a boring and unengaging film actually is a great study on voyeurism and social and moral decay. even though its set in the 80s its still extremely relevant today. fantastic performances from all, especially Kim Basinger- she reminds us on why she won that oscar. If you are a fan of the book i think that you should enjoy this film version, its not perfect but the tone and themes are present and that matters more than anything, to me at least.

As I began watching this movie, the immeidate parallel that I drew was “Less Than Zero.” I didn’t know until it was over, and googled the cast, that I found out that it was written by the same guy. Very similar in mood.

In fact, I think the mood is more the point of the movie than anything else, and in that respect I can testify for it’s accurate portrayal since I was exactly the age of characters at exactly that time. The dress, the look, the “searching”, the feel of opulent loneliness, or exquisite desperation… It really did feel exactly like that in the early to mid eighties club scene.

Others have criticized the story line for being shallow, but hey, we were shallow. There were a couple of places that I thought seemed a bit “contrived”, but even those mirrored some of my own sentiments from that time. I’m speaking of one instance where two of the guys are talking, and one of them is beginning to question his lifestyle and the other is definately not. He begins talking how he needs “someone to tell him what’s right and what’s wrong…” and I’m thinking, “Well, that came out of nowhere…” But when I look back, I did a lot of the same questioning myself, after coming home from a night on the beach clubs.

The movie is a series of pretty much independent character stories, in the same sort of vein as “Crash”, but without the obviously clear connections between all the characters. They seem less connected to each other than in Crash. I’m not sure what Renfro’s and Rourke’s characters had to do with anything, though, and that whole plot line could have been dropped from the movie entirely with no sense of loss at all. Not sure what they were there for other than to perhaps lend a hand to the feeling of depression which I think this movie is intentionally trying to create. Same for Bassingers and Thornton’s character line.

In fact, so independent are the stories from each other that you could drop almost any of them with no noticeable impact. The movie is the sum total of it’s parts, but the sum would certainly be a bit less with any of them missing. Altogether, they create an “air” of emptiness, loathing and desperation that really were the mood of 80’s nightlife. “To Live and Die in LA” has the same sort of grittiness to it.

What will help you survive this movie is to look at it differently than you are accustomed to. If you go in expecting the characters introduced at the beginning are going to be redeemed by the end, you will be disappointed. If you expect this to be a movie where all the knots are untangled by the end, where the rough edges are made smooth, the dillemas resolved, and harsh reality eased and made more bearable… you will be disappointed. This movie goes the other way and makes the smooth edges rough – the closing scene is particularly jagged.

Also of note is the soundtrack. It includes a lot of the “big names”, but it’s nice to see a movie about the 80s that doesn’t neglect to remind you that there was lots of music on the scene other than “Flock of Seagulls”. The soundtrack includes a lot of the other 99% of songs that never really made it to the Top Ten. This has the effect of intensifying the feeling of authenticity. You recall the music being like that, but not necessarily who did it. And that’s the way 80’s music really was. It was ubiquitous yet largely unknown; extremely transient. The only thing I can think of conspicuously missing is any reference to Miami Vice, although a character in the opening scene is dressed much like Don Johnson just before he gets killed.

SPOILER!

The sex is gratuitous and I could have done with less – a LOT less, in fact. But I think it may have been made excessive, but not specifically gratuiotous. I think there was a reason: it was to make a very hard impact on the closing scene. The dying Christie, laying on a cold, sunless beach, pale, ravaged now with AIDS. And on her pale, bruised covered thigh, a fly lands and crawls about for a while, while her former lover looks at her. This is the same beautiful body we were seeing before, now only weeks later cold and nearly dead with flies crawling on it. The contrast between soft and beautiful, and diseased and infected, on the same skin in so short a period of time. That really was a bit of a shock.

Watchmen – Director’s Cut Movie Download

Friday, November 6th, 2009

Watchmen - Director's Cut Movie Download

Watchmen - Director's Cut Movie Download

Download & Watch Watchmen – Director’s Cut at Amazon.com.

Click Here Now to Download & Watch Watchmen – Director’s Cut Online Now!

The director’s cut runs about 25 minutes longer, and incorporates more elements from the comics, adds more violence, as well as more shots of Dr. Manhatten’s schlong. Some of the previous scenes are reworked with additional dialogue. Information has been supported by sites such as AICN etc.

Overall, the storyline and conversations are better fleshed out, and this version is truer to the comics. The largest additional addition is that of Hollis Mason’s death, which is spectacularly directed to the score of the Intermezzo from the opera Cavalleria Rusticana (think Godfather III).

(1) Rorschach gets additional dialogue, some straight from the comics.

(2) When Rorschach searches the Comedian’s apartment shortly after the opening scene, he encounters two cops still stationed there. He fights briefly with them before jumping back out the window.

(3) Conversation between Dan and Rorschach (beans scene) is extended.

(4) All flashbacks extended, with the exception of Sally’s.

(5) Dr. Manhatten discussing the symbol on his forehead. Additional questions in the face to face with Dr. Manhatten. Dan and Hollis watch Dr. Manhatten go crazy on their TV set.

(6) Laurie getting interrogated by the military as they try to determine Dr. M’s whereabouts (on Mars). Alessandro Juliani’s (Lt. Gaeta from Battlestar Galactica) scene has been reinserted. He plays one of the scientists who bursts in during the interrogation of Laurie to tell the military that they’ve located Dr. M on Mars.

(7) Probably the biggest addition is the depiction of Hollis Mason’s death at the hands of the knot heads. Interestingly, the death is done from poor Hollis’ POV, where he imagines himself fighting the gangsters of the 1940s. He delivers left and right hooks to Captain Evil, before being done in by “Moloch”. The score for the death scene is very fitting.

(8) Dan taking revenge on an isolated knot head at a bar, post Hollis’ death. It’s a brutal revenge.

(9) The shootout by hired hitman Roy Chess is much more brutal- e.g. more blood and gore, fingers blown off.

(10) Conversation between Dr. Long and Rorschach is extended.

(11) Longer jail-break scene with arguments between Rorschach and Laurie. Prison guards open fire on Dan’s ship.

(12) Longer conversation between Dr. M and L on Mars.

(13) Riot scene is longer with more conversation between the Comedian and the rioters.

(14) Agent Forbes (Fulvio Cecere) has a larger role as the government agent in charge of handling all the Watchmen.

This is THE version to get. It feels complete.

This edition is an improvement over the theatrical release and is closer to the book. My only disappointment related to this edition was that I opened the package to find a coupon for the ULTIMATE edition, which is to be released Decemberish. The next (and I hope final) version will have the Black Freighter story woven into the main story as it is in the book. If you don’t want multiple versions of this film, hold off buying until the end of the year.

I agree with the other reviewers who note the film’s ending is an improvement over the book’s. It just makes more sense in the context of the story. This is not a knock on Mr. Moore, of whom I am a big fan.

I don’t understand the folks who are so down on this film, unless it is that they just had the wrong expectations and/or didn’t do their homework before watching it. It was never meant to be another Spiderman, Superman or Hulk story.

Kudos to Mr. Moore. Kudos for the team who produced this film.

*SPOILER WARNING*

Let me be blunt.

Alan Moore should eat crow and be proud of this movie. “Unfilmable” it most certainly wasn’t.

And the fanboys all need to take a laxative. This was in at least some ways better than the maxi-series/graphic novel, which will never be demoted from its status as a classic of its medium.

Aside from the overly graphic violence, a gratuituous sex scene, and Dr. Manhattan’s needless nudity (he needed to wear pants, and seeing his genitalia added nothing to the plot)I really have nothing negative to say about Watchmen.

Let’s diffuse some of the criticisms I’ve come across.

Yes, Matthew Goode was foppish as Ozymandias. He’s supposed to be that way. He’s not intended to exude menace. That’s his style. A villian as sublime as Ozymandias is subtle. Coming across as overtly malevolent would have caused his plans to fail. His slender, Aryan appearance and slight German accent made him the perfect choice to play the type of foe who believes that the murder of millions is the only way to save the world.

Which brings me to the casting. There was not one actor who didn’t fit their respective character like Rorschach’s inkblot mask. The decisions made concerning who should play who were more accurate than any comic book movie I can think of.

Jeffrey Dean Morgan’s Comedian was Burt Reynolds as a misogynist sociopath. It was as if the character himself was directly lifted from the pages of the graphic novel and given life. It was uncanny how Morgan captured this character’s all too easy violence, his nonchalant, happy penchant for brutality.

I said in a review of Batman:The Dark Knight that Heath Ledger’s portrayal of the Joker was unfathomably good, especially considering Ledger’s teen idol pedigree.

Jackie Earle Haley’s Rorschach dethrones Ledger’s Joker in that regard. From out of some forgotten void, a former heart throb returns to play a madman akin to Robert DeNiro’s Travis Bickle or Michael Douglas’ William Foster. My money would be on Haley’s Rorschach as Steve Ditko’s right-wing Objectivist Mr. A, the analogue for Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons’ character, is channeled with such a chilling and disturbed beauty. His guilt is blended with an intolerance as he claims that the dead heroine Silhouette met her fate due to being a lesbian. When Haley takes off the mask, things become even more unnverving as you see how “fascinatingly ugly” Walter Kovacs, Rorschach’s alter ego is, inside and out. Again, having a former Tiger Beat hero play such a character was just remarkable to me. 20 years from now, people will never believe that Haley was once a Bad News Bear, and for that alone he deserves an Oscar. Seriously. His performance is more than enough to recommend this film to anyone.

None of the other performances disappoint. Patrick Wilson’s Nite Owl also deserves mention as he nails down the David Brinkley (from Robert Mayer’s obscure but very influential 1977 novel ‘Superfolks’) as Batman that Moore and Gibbons intended Nite Owl to be. He’s awkward, stuffy, insecure, and rusty in crimefighting and life in general, and Wilson flawlessly gets that across.

As an aside, and us comics fans need to face this fact, the film versions of Silk Spectre, Nite Owl, and Ozymandias absolutely trump the comics versions in terms of design. Silk Spectre is sexier, Nite Owl is fierce, sleek, and punches his wonky-looking comics counterpart back to DC’s Silver Age, and here Ozymandias is a Greek god compared to Gibbons’ take.

Some people are complaining that Malin Akerman’s Silk Spectre was dry, but I thought she was fine. In fact, she was just the right mixture of innocent and sultry and thusly kept with the spirit of not only Silk Spectre herself but also of the characters that inspired Moore and Gibbons to create her. Akerman was one mod version of Phantom Lady or Nightshade.

Remember, they’re all analogues because if they weren’t, we wouldn’t have had any Blue Beetle or Question tales in the 80’s.

Carla Gugino is quite the aging diva here. Her makeup job as a senior (The Silk Spectre’s mother and predecessor) is so astonishing you’d think she was an unknown. In the flashback sequences she is the epitome of retro eroticism.

She sees herself in an underground porn comic and is flattered. Wow.

And speaking of unknowns, can anyone honestly think of any famous actors who would have done as well or better in these roles? Yet another reason why Watchmen is such a success. John Cusack as Nite Owl? Please.

So the casting was faithful as was the entire movie for the most part, thereby squashing another gripe the fans had. I’ll even go as far as to say that Watchmen works so well because it is very faithful to its source material.

Yes, the ending is somewhat different, yet is pretty much the same. Ozymandias stages nuclear attacks instead of an alien invasion to unite mankind, “killing millions to save billions” as he himself would put it.

You know, when I read the Watchmen chapter in David Hughes’ book “The Greatest Sci-Fi Movies Never Made,” and saw that Sam Hamm didn’t feel that the ending of the original comics story “worked” for him, I knew then and there that the makers of Watchmen the film weren’t going to completely stick to Moore and Gibbons’ vision. And that slight difference (it’s just a parallel path to the same destination) only made for a better movie.

Alien invasions are not timely in any period, let alone this alternate Nixon-led 1985 or 2009. The threat of mutually assured nuclear holocaust is. If humanity is to be dealt a serious blow, it will be by humanity’s own hand, not something from beyond our solar system.

What we have with the cinematic Watchmen, is what I believe we had with the original tale. It’s a treatise on those who rule the world, masked as a superhero yarn, which in turn is masked as a murder mystery. It makes you think, and at the same time is mindful of that needed sense of wonder. It’s scary, nihilistic, exciting, provocative, and its ending is as hopeful as it is troubling.

The tale of the Watchmen is like a railroad track that is built with the best of aims yet leads to nowhere but perdition. What will our elites do, or what are they above or not above doing to improve the human condition? Who in power can we trust? In the movie, we see Nixon, Kissinger, and other real-life malefactors who did what they did for personal gain. What of Ozymandias? What did he stand to gain? Did he really love humankind or have nothing but detached contempt for it? We see this with Billy Crudup’s Dr. Manhattan as well, although Manhattan suffers from disappointment and heartbroken selfishness, whereas Ozymandias has this sense of birthright to save the world from itself by way of genocide.

I may need to dig out my copy of Watchmen the graphic novel as it has admittedly been a few years since I last perused it, but as a comics fan of 30 years, as someone who holds the highest respect and a deep love for comics as an artform and recognizes the Moore/Gibbons masterwork as deserving of its status, I will state that Watchmen was more that worth the wait. One could even make a case that it’s a better movie because it took so long to happen, that development hell aided in making it what it is.

And it bears repeating, Watchmen, with some minor and essential tweaking, is reverent of the comic book, and that reverence is another component that makes the movie so engrossing.

There was a time when I didn’t think that a Watchmen film should be made. However, upon seeing the final product, I am left with some questions.

Why isn’t Alan Moore rejoicing?

And why isn’t comics fandom rejoicing along with him?

Even if you’ve never read a comic book in your life, I strongly recommend Watchmen. If it doesn’t make you a fan of the comic book or of comics in general, then you didn’t enjoy the film, and if you didn’t enjoy the film, I have nothing to say to you. If you think that your unfamiliarity with the characters, the fact that they aren’t icons like Batman and Spider-Man, will hinder your enjoyment, remind yourself of the Hellboy phenomenon. Hellboy was a mid-level character that has never had an ongoing series and was published by a company that was not Marvel or DC. He has since been the subject of a pair of moviehouse blockbusters. Also be mindful of the the popular Men In Black franchise and its origin as an obscure independent comic book. From the looks of it, the heroes/villians (are they one and the same?) of Watchmen are about to join that club.

If you are a comics fan and haven’t seen it yet, leave the nitpicker in you at home, allow yourself to be surprised in the best way possible, and go ahead and be a little smug as the closing credits roll. You deserve it for being so far ahead of the curve.

A monument of comics finally has a cinematic counterpart. Hold your head high.

Streaming Tyler Perry’s Madea Goes To Jail

Thursday, November 5th, 2009

Streaming Tyler Perry's Madea Goes To Jail

Streaming Tyler Perry's Madea Goes To Jail

Download & Watch Tyler Perry’s Madea Goes To Jail at Amazon.com.

Click Here Now to Download & Watch Tyler Perry’s Madea Goes To Jail Online Now!

“Tyler Perry’s Madea Goes To Jail” is great! This is how the story goes: After a high-speed freeway chase puts Madea in front of the judge, her reprieve is short-lived as anger management issues get the best of her and land her in jail. A gleeful Joe couldn’t be happier at Madea’s misfortune. But Madea’s eccentric family members the Browns rally behind her, lending their special “country” brand of support. Meanwhile, Assistant District Attorney Joshua Hardaway is on the fast track to career success. But Hardaway lands a case too personal to handle – defending young prostitute and former drug addict Candace Washington – and asks his fiancee and fellow ADA Linda Holmes to fill in on his behalf. When Candace ends up in jail, Madea befriends the young woman, protecting her in a “motherly” way as only Madea can.

The cast led by Tyler Perry (back in his roles as Madea / Brian / Joe), Derek Luke (as Joshua Hardaway), & Keshia Knight Pulliam (as Candace Washington) is great! The directing and story and screenplay by Perry (who also produced) (who also produced and directed and wrote the stories and screenplays to “Madea’s Family Reunion” (2006, also starred as Madea / Brian / Joe), “Daddy’s Little Girls” (2007), “Why Did I Get Married?” (2007, also starred as Terry), “Meet The Browns” (2008, also starred as Madea / Joe) & “The Family That Preys” (2008, also starred as Ben), he also wrote and produced “Diary Of A Mad Black Woman” (2005, also starred as Madea / Brian / Joe) is great!

The music by Aaron Zigman (who also did the music to Perry’s “Why Did I Get Married?”, “Meet The Browns”, & “The Family That Preys” is great! The cinematography by Alexander Gruszynski (who also did the cinematography to “This Christmas” (2007) is great! The film editing by Maysie Hoy (who has been doing the casting to Perry’s films since “Daddy’s Little Girls”) is great! The production design by Ina Mayhew (who has been doing the production design on Perry’s films since “Diary Of A Mad Black Woman”) is great! The casting by Kim Hardin (who also did the casting to “This Christmas”) is great! The art direction by Mark Erbaugh (who also did the art direction to “The Family That Preys”) is great! The costume design by Keith G. Lewis (who has been doing the costume design to Perry’s films since “Diary Of A Mad Black Woman”) is great!

This is an great comedy that is funny and heartwarming at times. This is another hit from Tyler Perry. Madea’s back and funnier than ever.

The antics of Madea in and out of jail are ALWAYS fun to watch, but the story about Candy and her meeting Madea gave this movie the seriousness it needed to be solid. We’re given comedy and something to think about. And Madea does delightfully in jail, whether she’s in class or fighting that big blonde. 4.5/5 stars for a entertaining flick.

This is a great movie. It is, by far, my favorite Tyler Perry movie to date. It’s laugh out loud funny and the actors are fantastic. I’ve seen all of Tyler Perry’s plays and movies. He’s exceptionally talented and I love all of his work but I’m a bigger fan of his movies rather than his plays. I believe that’s where the division of the reviews will lie. If you’re a bigger fan of his plays, you may not agree with my review.

Download Escape From Hell

Thursday, November 5th, 2009

Download Escape From Hell

Download Escape From Hell

Download & Watch Escape From Hell at Amazon.com.

Click Here Now to Download & Watch Escape From Hell Online Now!

In my opinion this was just a bad movie. I’m not talking like i expected a troma movie to be good, but this one was just not fun. The whole movie is a “serious” film about women trapped in a prison and being abused by guards. THey escape, hillarity does not ensue. THe movie is slow and often times unwatchable due to dubbed over dialogue. As DVD’s go the image quality is pretty blurry, it looks like a 70’s film. But as far as Troma DVD goes it is about average. On a high note there is a pretty rockin’ scene in the jail cell where two women, well, discover each other. Lot’s of boobs and pubes. Aside from that this movie is a slow, tedious and often times depressing trip through the world of the back woods penal system. A definite renter if anything.

The first thing of note with a women in prison movie like ‘Escape From Hell’ is that if you are looking for cinematic art you are looking in the wrong place. ‘Escape From Hell’ caters to one thing; male libido. In this movie we have catfights (naked and clothed), sweat, bare bodies, sweat, shower and bathing scenes, sweat, lashings, sweat, lesbian scenes, sweat, people putting their mouths where they probably don’t belong, and did I mention sweat. The plot is basic. A new warden arrives at the equivalent of a Devil’s Island prison for women. This new warden is one sadistist martinet who lucks out to have a bevy of whip weilding guards with personalities to match. As conditions degenerate for the prisoners, they devise a plan to escape. In addition to our warden we have one nasty bald lead guard who will have you searching for a Yul Brenner movie just to get the bad taste out of your mouth; a female guard with a dubbed voice that sounds like a cross between a cartoon character and Gilbert Gottfried; and of course a compassionate character who happen to be an alcoholic doctor with emotional problems. ‘Escape From Hell’ stars Christina Lau and rumored transsexual film star Ajita Wilson in an Italian/Spanish production. Much of this movie was re-edited with parts from another movie starring Christina Lau with more scenes added which starred Linda Blair and released as ‘Savage Island’ in the US. Wth regard to the quality of the DVD presentation, it looks fine on my 20″ television and is not a bad EP copy as one reviewer stated. It is not widescreen which is a disappointment, and as far as bonus material goes, this DVD is self serving to Troma; I do not care for a bio of Lloyd Kaufman. If you like ‘women in prison’ movies, this more than delivers the goods; if you find this subject distasteful, you are on the wrong page.–Bob

This movie is about a group of girls in prison who plan to escape because of the arival of a new prison bos, who is verry sadistic. The movie shows a lot t & a. the irritating in the movie is that they speak englisch and most girls are white altough te story tooks place in south america.

Ice Pirates Streaming

Monday, November 2nd, 2009

Ice Pirates Streaming

Ice Pirates Streaming

Download & Watch Ice Pirates at Amazon.com.

Click Here Now to Download & Watch Ice Pirates Online Now!

This is the movie that killed Mary Crosby’s career and nearly derailed Robert Urich’s, Angelica Houston’s and Ron Perlman’s. It’s one of those movies – like 1941 and Paint Your Wagon – that everyone knows is a total turkey, except for those who place what they see on the screen above what they read in the reviews. If you liked Mars Attacks! and Buckaroo Banzai, and laughed your ass off at Spaced Invaders and Killer Clowns from Outer Space, you’ll love Ice Pirates.

The time is the distant future, where by far the most precious commodity in the galaxy is water. The idea that there were once ten planets whose surface was principally covered by water is considered a myth by most people, as is the story that the last surviving water planet was somehow removed to the unreachable center of the galaxy at the end of the galactic trade wars. The galaxy is ruled by your basic evil emperor (John Carradine) presiding over a trade oligarchy that controls all mining and sale of ice from asteroids and comets.

Robert Urich is Jason, leader of a band of ice pirates that includes Ron Perlman, John Matuzak and Michael D Roberts. Of course, the crew also prominently features the obligatory unbeatable master swordsman and latter-day samurai, but, in a blow for equality, the part is played to perfection by Angelica Houston. In the formulaic plot for outlaw space operas, our heroes attack an ice freighter, are captured, but escape with a princess (Mary Crosby) kidnapped by the evil emperor in tow. They rescue her, thread the perilous path to the center of the universe and the fabled tenth planet, and destroy the evil empire’s stranglehold on the people.

Along the way, you are treated to some of film’s oddest aliens, god-awful puns and excellent lampoons of space opera icons. It’s full of bona fide toilet humor, from the pirates breaking through the hull of the ice freighter into a lavatory whose commode is occupied by a chickenman, to the standard reconditioning for outlaws and other deviants – castration by mechanical chompers, a lobotomy and a blond dye job, then sale as a soprano domestic slave.

Ice Pirates is the illegitimate child of Star Wars and Animal House. The jokes, both verbal and physical, range from the hackneyed to the truly brilliant – and most of both will have you rolling on the floor. It’s a an hour-and-a-half of pure unadulterated fun. When I finally get the 6′ x 8′ screen for our light projector mounted, this will be one of the first movies we watch.

What a wonderful piece of sci-fi fun! I always loved this picture since the first time I saw it WAAAYYY back in ‘84. I have to admit, it’s not for everybody. You really have to be in a class of science fiction fans who also enjoy movies like Sleeper or tv shows like Red Dwarf. My only regret about Ice Pirates was that the director didn’t have a larger budget–then again… Urich, Roberts and Huston (The Space Samurai Chick!) really steal the show–check out the gut-funny scene when Ulrich and Roberts were about to lose their “manhood”. Hilarious!! The story is ludicrous in itself, water has become more valuable than gold or silver. I always found it funny that these people have the ability of interstellar travel but they can’t produce water. I give the movie four stars–even though it loooks really bad on tv–in anyevent, Ice Pirates makes me wish filmmakers would produce more sci-fi satires. Long Live Jason and his Ice Pirates!

Crisp and clean transfer… excellent quality… and finally in widescreen. The Ice Pirates was ahead of it’s time, blending light Sci-Fi with comedy in a manner not seen again until Spaceballs. Aliens, robots, princesses, and time warps abound in this classic… where the humor isn’t limited to bland jokes. The sets homage not only the classics of 60’s SciFi… but the more serious 80’s Science Fiction films. Anyone who considers themselves a SciFi buff should pick this one up, as no collection is complete without it’s campy insanity. Sparse on the extras, but beggars can’t be choosers. Those who’ve only seen the craptacular VHS copy owe this film another look on DVD…

For those who haven’t seen it… the sum-up of the movie is this. Take Spaceballs, Princess Bride, and Alien… mix in a blender… throw in some 60’s SciFi camp and cool robots… and there you go. Given it’s been 21 years since the widescreen version has been available to the public… this is a must have Cult classic!

Download Charlie and the Chocolate Factory Movie

Friday, October 30th, 2009

Download Charlie and the Chocolate Factory Movie

Download Charlie and the Chocolate Factory Movie

Download & Watch Charlie and the Chocolate Factory at Amazon.com.

Click Here Now to Download & Watch Charlie and the Chocolate Factory Online Now!

I once made the comment that most of the entertainment today is in very unpleasant shape. The industries are trying to relive past glories, especially music and movies. Most of the money being made in the music industry is reissues, HDCD releases of distinguished titles, delux reissues, legacy reissues, offical releases of bootlegs, greatest hits, and any and all repackaging of classic albums. And they all utilize well known, classic, stout name artists, because they know people will retract it. Because the majority of unusual CDs, and fresh artists aren’t of any precise quality, they have to rely on the customary stuff to originate money. The same can be said of the movies. It’s all sequels, prequels, remakes, and remodels.

Accordingly, I was not thrilled when I heard a original version of “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory” was coming out. When I learned it was a Tim Burton/Danny Elfman/Johnny Depp production, I was less skeptical. When I saw a trailer, I was alive to. When I heard Danny Elfman was writing/composing the music AND doing the vocals, I was angry. The collaboration is stout, almost to the point of excusing all their pretensiousness and self-absorbtion… enough quibbling. On to the movie!

It holds many of Tim Burton’s staples; it is dismal, stark, eerie, and filled with the regular unnamable props, but he has allowed joy into the equation. The movie is remarkable better for it. There is rich color, specifically in the factory, to match the rich imagery and humorous comparisons of Willy Wonka. Depp is cast perfectly in this role, which is not really apparent unless you perceive the movie. He is laughable, quirky, confused, and innocent; distinguished different than the intelligent, strong character played by Gene Wilder in the current. The children who score the golden tickets and their parents do a grand job too. Perhaps my celebrated piece is the wild card, Danny Elfman. If you don’t know WHO Elfman is, you’re definite to have heard his music whether in any number of cult classic 80’s films (Pee Wee’s Gargantuan Adventure, Beetlejuice, Batman 1 & 2), his TV themes (The Simpsons), his musical-esque movies featuring his vocals (Nightmare Before Christmas– an absolute classic soundtrack), or his 15-plus years of work as the vocalist/writer/guitarist for 80’s heavyweight Oingo Boingo. “Charlie” is the 11th time Tim Burton has musty Elfman as his composer, and this is arguably their greatest work together (though I hold “Nightmare Before Christmas”) .

The movie itself is quite inviting, entertaining into parts of the Willy Wonka myth the orignal movie didn’t, relying more on the Ron Dahl book. Note: even the lyrics to the four Oompa-Loompa songs are the lyrics from the modern. We learn that Willy became a chocolateer to spite his father and is forever skittish by this falling out. An eventual redemtion of their relationship serves as a very sure pro-family element. Best of all, it’s shapely. Nothing negative, offensive, or disturbing is presented, meaning a green light for families and kids; a Ample plus. The spot of lacking special features is corrected here, but you can assign a few dollars if you don’t mind a slimmer package. A tall, enormous, fun movie.

Overall: 9 out of 10.

First off, yes, I am a fan of Tim Burton. I even maintain every one of his movies on DVD (though one or two of them I could live without) . But that’s not the point. The fact is, I respect his vision as an artist; and his ability to construct such surrealistic worlds that are both unfamiliar and astonishing are unbiased enough why I idolize him.

Okay, now, some of you may wonder, if this is a vow remake of the 1971 film Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory that starred Gene Wilder. Actually, no, even though it’s the same myth view. The only contrast is that this film pays more homage to the book (Distinguished more homage) and is (of course) Astounding to peruse at. The storyline now, is simple enough (because I’m under the impression that a lot of people have seen the fresh film) : Charlie Bucket (Freddie Highmore) is a boy from an impoverished family living under the shadow of a giant chocolate factory, who eventually wins a candy bar contest and is given a tour, along with four other children, of the improbable factory hurry by the eccentric Willy Wonka and his staff of Oompa-Loompas.

Performance wise, this movie belongs to Johnny Depp and Freddie Highmore, who are able to recreate their chemistry from Finding Neverland. However, quote: “Depp’s Wonka is far less cuddly than that of Gene Wilder, playing it more like a demented Mr. Rogers with more than a bit of a sadistic trot. The blueprint that he watches the kids meet their fates with giddy glee is quite disturbing, but it’s hard not to delight in this quirky hermit’s complete lack of social skills.”-Edward Douglas, [...] (sorry, but the guy explianed it perfectly) Also, I’d like to determined this up out of my system before it does any more hurt, but it seems A LOT of ….people are comparing Depp’s Wonka w/ a positive pop star so considerable that it really unprejudiced sickens me. This assessment can be contradicted however. First reason (and this came from no other than Depp himself) : In an interview, Johnny said he had NO Blueprint whatsoever to cross his character off of Micheal Jackson. Second reason: Willy Wonka is a recluse, so he’s supposed to be exclusive, outlandish, crazy, whatever. I mean, the guy shunned himself from society for 15 years so he’s going to be pale, out of style/trend, and a bit late. Also, throughout the movie, we’re shown flashbacks of Wonka’s past that are customary to justify his weirdness. There, ruin of legend. Freddie Highmore’s Charlie is more unlit than the unique one, so worthy that you’ll want to hug him b/c he’s so optimistic depsite living such an impoverished lifestyle. Another performance nod goes to Deep Roy, who plays all the Oompa-Loompas w/ such panache. Everyone else is suited in their performances.

Now, aesthetically, this film is amazing; in fact, this is Burton’s most visually striking film to date. He yet again creates such surreal and imaginative landscapes that it’s unbiased exact glance candy to view at; the factory rooms being the prime example. Some of the wacky machinery frail to develop candy is objective as impressive and actually looks like it could work. Yet, as w/ the novel film, this film creates an atmosphere that could unnerve sensitive folks. The boat perambulate down the chocolate tunnel is not the acid lunge that was the recent, but rather like an intense roller coaster tear. Also, for those who have seen the recent, the four kids who descend to their weaknesses (loosely speaking: gluttony, pride, avarice(that’s greed) and sloth) and punished for not heeding warnings are a bit more uncertain (thanks to the evolution of filmmaking) and watch fatal, but are not.

Also, another treat in this film is to hear composer Danny Elfman (who has detached handsome considerable all of Tim Burton’s films to date set aside for Ed Wood, which was scored by Howard Shore) shriek again. He sings all the Oompa-Loompa songs provided by the lyrics written in the book with such style that you can’t abet but tap your feet. For the characterize, he also sung in Tim Burton’s The Nightmare Before Christmas.

Well, I contain I covered over everything. Overall, dependable faithful adaptation that surpasses the modern in practically every plan (sorry, but…my concept) . Also, the ending is different, both from the book and the modern film; but serene apt. This is also Burton’s best film next to Ed Wood and redeems him from his Planet of the Apes remake (what was he thinking w/ that? ) . Anyways, substantial film: fair as wacky and crooked as you might quiz but nonetheless extraordinary to perceive at and as magical as the recent.

This movie is really proper. Several other reviewers are unfairly comparing it to the the 1971 Gene Wilder version, “Willy Wonka & the Chocolate Factory.” The Johnny Depp version is actually remarkable closer to the children’s book written by Roald Dahl. In fact, Roald Dahl completely hated the Gene Wilder version because the film makers changed everything in his book. One reviewer says that Johnny Depp’s portrayal of Willy Wonka was scary and wierd. Well, if you’ve read the book, you’ll know that Willy Wonka is supposed to be scary and wierd.

Brandon Simpson,

[...]